I noticed an AP story on MSNBC about Iraq. The headline caught my eye. It said the increase in deaths was casting doubt on the surge.
But when I read the column, it didn't say that anywhere in the column. It simply noted that a suicide bomber had killed several soldiers and that a total of 10 had died in the last week. That's absolutely horrible, as one soldier's death would be, but the characterization seemed to have a political aim, rather than the goal of telling the truth.
It further noted that there had been an increase in civilian deaths per day, but then a near-afterthought was dropped in that mass graves were counted when they were found, not when the people died. A mass grave was found this month.
America is fighting AQI (Al Qaeda in Iraq) in Mosul, south of Baghdad, where the British used to be. That fighting will surely result in casualties, just as the continued presence in other Iraqi cities will. But Mosul is the last stand of AQI and I would expect the fighting to be bitter.
In the end, my perspective is only what I read, but I know enough to seek those who are there rather than those who are crafting stories from a New York office building. Here is what I would recommend to anyone who would like to know more about the war in Iraq - the good and the bad.
Michael Yon - embedded independent reporter
The best I can tell, the MSNBC article was intended to deceive. I can't imagine how else you can get from the facts they presented to the conclusion they told you to make.
Sad.
sharp